Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 80% cheaper than Captiva - €829.0 vs €4089.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Apex Legends than Captiva - €10.49 vs €13.41 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 286% better in Apex Legends than Memory - 305 vs 79 FPS
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
48th Variation
FPS
79
25.901639344262296%
Value, €/FPS
€10.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€829
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1640 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
305
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.41/FPS
78.22520507084265%
Price, €
€4089
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2410 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
48th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
48th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
12.013528748590756%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
7.227906976744186%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
48th Variation
Core i7-10700F
null-core
Single-Core
1612
51.86615186615187%
Multi-Core
7231
34.36460412508316%
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-10700F | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |