Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 25% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 287 vs 229 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 1080 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€949
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1081 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
394th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
394th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1000 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
