Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 166 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Megaport - €1729.00 vs €1899.00
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €10.42 vs €11.72 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
451st Variation
36th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
451st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
79%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
80%
GPU Winner
36th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
451st Variation
Ryzen 7 7700X
4.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2908
100%
Multi-Core
15263
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7700X | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |