Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 71% cheaper than Captiva - €1179.0 vs €4089.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Captiva - €21.44 vs €22.97 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 224% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Memory - 178 vs 55 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
44th Variation
FPS
55
30.89887640449438%
Value, €/FPS
€21.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1179
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3870 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€22.97/FPS
93.33913800609491%
Price, €
€4089
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4640 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
44th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
44th Variation
Radeon RX 6400
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
16.746335963923336%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
8.635658914728683%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
44th Variation
Core i7-13700K
null-core
Single-Core
2840
91.37709137709138%
Multi-Core
17611
83.69451573044387%
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-13700K | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
Radeon RX 6400 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |