Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 70% cheaper than Megaport - €729.00 vs €2439.00
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 270% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 200 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Memory - €12.20 vs €13.50 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 323 minutes ago
48th Variation
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2439
29%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 321 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
436th Variation
48th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
436th Variation
GeForce GTX 1630
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
10%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
7%
48th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
48th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
GeForce GTX 1630 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |