Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield IV than Memory - 173 vs 147 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Memory - €799.00 vs €1019.00
- Up to 33% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Memory - €4.62 vs €6.93 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 317 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 324 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
438th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
438th Variation
GeForce GTX 1630
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
20%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
438th Variation
Core i7-12700K
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2531
100%
Multi-Core
13694
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600G |
| GeForce GTX 1630 | GPU | Radeon RX 6600 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
