Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 43% better in World of Warcraft than Memory - 154 vs 108 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 195859 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€929
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1158 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
370th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
370th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660
6 GB GDDR5 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
73%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
67%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2052
100%
Multi-Core
8610
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
