Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 73% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 359 vs 208 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 54% cheaper than Memory - €929.0 vs €2039.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing World of Tanks than Memory - €4.47 vs €5.68 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
428th Variation
FPS
359
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.68/FPS
78.69718309859155%
Price, €
€2039
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,039 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7445 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
208
57.938718662952645%
Value, €/FPS
€4.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€929
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
428th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
428th Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
50.6215173596228%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
40.500685871056234%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
78.0066200809121%
Multi-Core
9729
64.12470340100185%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |