Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 33% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 156 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €12.94 vs €13.32 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 23% cheaper than Memory - €1559.00 vs €2019.00
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €2,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
Buy for €1,559 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 295 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
428th Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
428th Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
59%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
428th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
CPU Winner
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
93%
Multi-Core
13890
92%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
