Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — CSL outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of CSL Gaming PC
- Performs up to 25% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 81 vs 65 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Memory - €579.0 vs €629.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Memory - €7.15 vs €9.68 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
42nd Variation
FPS
65
80.24691358024691%
Value, €/FPS
€9.68/FPS
73.86363636363636%
Price, €
€629
92%
Buy for €629 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74756 minutes ago
Buy for €579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74757 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
42nd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
42nd Variation
Radeon RX 6400
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
78.34036568213784%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
76.55850276019927%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
42nd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
88.21310702498822%
Multi-Core
7692
79.06259636139377%
Memory PC | vs | CSL Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| Radeon RX 6400 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
