Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 236% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 188 vs 56 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 291 minutes ago
35th Variation
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 293 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
419th Variation
35th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
419th Variation
Radeon RX 6400
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
26%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
14%
GPU Winner
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
419th Variation
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2620
100%
Multi-Core
15445
100%
CPU Winner
35th Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
97%
Multi-Core
13890
90%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| Radeon RX 6400 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
