Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 45% cheaper than Megaport - €659.00 vs €1199.00
- Up to 33% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €7.40 vs €11.10 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 108 vs 89 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €659 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4701 minutes ago
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4699 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
349th Variation
19th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
349th Variation
Radeon RX 6700
10 GB GDDR6 | 160-bit
Pixel Fillrate
156.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
352.8 GTexel/s
100%
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
78%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
98%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
19th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 6700 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
