Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 122% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 173 vs 78 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 739 minutes ago
20th Variation
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1619
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,619 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 736 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
408th Variation
20th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
408th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
17%
GPU Winner
20th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
408th Variation
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2620
100%
Multi-Core
15445
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
