Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 65% cheaper than Megaport - €849.00 vs €2439.00
- Up to 23% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €9.43 vs €12.20 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 122% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 200 vs 90 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6869 minutes ago
Buy for €2,439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6863 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
337th Variation
48th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
337th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
24%
48th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
48th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10400F | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
