Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 31% better in Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - 98 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - €8.97 vs €9.99 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 15% cheaper than Memory - €749.00 vs €879.00
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2376 minutes ago
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2375 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
335th Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
335th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
67%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
71%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
335th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
