Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 64% cheaper than Megaport - €939.0 vs €2639.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - €10.1 vs €10.56 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 169% better in Monster Hunter: World than Memory - 250 vs 93 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €939 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 936 minutes ago
26th Variation
FPS
250
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.56/FPS
95.64393939393938%
Price, €
€2639
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,639 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 934 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
390th Variation
26th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
390th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
29.866946778711483%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
24.387254901960784%
26th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
390th Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
60.1994851994852%
Multi-Core
7692
36.55546050755631%
26th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1000 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |