Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 39% cheaper than Megaport - €949.00 vs €1559.00
- Up to 5% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Megaport - €4.02 vs €4.21 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 57% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 370 vs 236 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 828 minutes ago
Buy for €1,559 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 827 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
320th Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
320th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
27%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
100%
Multi-Core
13890
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
