Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 16% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 116 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Memory - €919.00 vs €1119.00
- Up to 29% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Memory - €7.92 vs €11.19 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 504 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€919
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 509 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
384th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
384th Variation
Radeon RX 6600 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
71%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
100%
Multi-Core
8539
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
