Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 46% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 147 vs 101 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 723 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1559
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,559 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 723 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
382nd Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
382nd Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
81%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
100%
Multi-Core
13890
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
