Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 1100% better in Starfield than Memory - 48 vs 4 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 445 minutes ago
52nd Variation
FPS
48
100%
Value, €/FPS
€34.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1649
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
371st Variation
52nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
371st Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
37%
52nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
52nd Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 3600 | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
