Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 128 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Megaport - €1059.00 vs €1399.00
- Up to 36% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €8.27 vs €12.95 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,059 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6477 minutes ago
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6474 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
298th Variation
30th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
298th Variation
Radeon RX 6800
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
202.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
505.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
68%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
298th Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
97%
CPU Winner
30th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
92%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| Radeon RX 6800 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
