Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 72% better in Battlefield 1 than Memory - 148 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Memory - €949.00 vs €1109.00
- Up to 50% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Memory - €6.41 vs €12.90 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4207 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€949
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4206 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
284th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
284th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39%
GPU Winner
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
284th Variation
Core i7-12700K
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2555
100%
Multi-Core
13791
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
