Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than Megaport - €1039.00 vs €1749.00
- Up to 11% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Megaport - €7.81 vs €8.74 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 50% better in World of Warcraft than Memory - 200 vs 133 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €1,039 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 458 minutes ago
Buy for €1,749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1005 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
284th Variation
50th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
284th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
17%
GPU Winner
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
284th Variation
Core i7-12700K
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2531
100%
Multi-Core
13694
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700K | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
