Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than Captiva - €1109.00 vs €1889.00
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 950% better in Immortals of Aveum than Memory - 42 vs 4 FPS
- Up to 84% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Memory - €44.98 vs €277.25 per FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4273 minutes ago
Buy for €1,889 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4270 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
284th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
284th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
34%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
20%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2608
100%
Multi-Core
15118
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700K | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
