Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 72% cheaper than Megaport - €659.0 vs €2349.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Megaport - €5.49 vs €10.0 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 96% better in World of Warcraft than Memory - 235 vs 120 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
347th Variation
FPS
120
51.06382978723404%
Value, €/FPS
€5.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€659
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €659 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1665 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10/FPS
54.900000000000006%
Price, €
€2349
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1662 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
347th Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
347th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
18.655462184873947%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
11.426470588235293%
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
347th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
null-core
Single-Core
2092
70.31932773109244%
Multi-Core
8659
45.01923676822294%
16th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
