Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 20% better in Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - 196 vs 164 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 18% cheaper than Memory - €1499.00 vs €1819.00
- Up to 2% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Memory - €9.14 vs €9.28 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,819 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
341st Variation
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
341st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
73%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
31st Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
