Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 125% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 376 vs 167 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 56% cheaper than Memory - €799.00 vs €1819.00
- Up to 1% better value when playing World of Tanks than Memory - €4.78 vs €4.84 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,819 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 429 minutes ago
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 432 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
341st Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
341st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
45%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
341st Variation
Core i9-11900F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2171
100%
Multi-Core
9171
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600G |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | Radeon RX 6600 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
