Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 19% cheaper than Captiva - €1529.00 vs €1889.00
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 29% better in World of Tanks than Memory - 323 vs 250 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing World of Tanks than Memory - €5.85 vs €6.12 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,529 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Buy for €1,889 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 758 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
266th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
266th Variation
Radeon RX 6700
10 GB GDDR6 | 160-bit
Pixel Fillrate
156.8 GPixel/s
99%
Texel Fillrate
352.8 GTexel/s
77%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
266th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| Radeon RX 6700 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
