Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 44% cheaper than Megaport - €739.00 vs €1329.00
- Up to 21% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €9.60 vs €12.19 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 42% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 109 vs 77 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 278 minutes ago
Buy for €1,329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 830 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
252nd Variation
29th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
252nd Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
81%
GPU Winner
29th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
252nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
87%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
