Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 63% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 188 vs 115 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 59% cheaper than Memory - €929.00 vs €2279.00
- Up to 33% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Memory - €8.08 vs €12.12 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Buy for €929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
231st Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
231st Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
42%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
231st Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2145
100%
Multi-Core
9696
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
