Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 22% better in Monster Hunter: World than Memory - 163 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Memory - €1149.00 vs €1289.00
- Up to 27% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Memory - €7.05 vs €9.62 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,289 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2615 minutes ago
49th Variation
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1149
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2606 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
226th Variation
49th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
226th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
77%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
76%
GPU Winner
49th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
226th Variation
Core i9-11900F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2171
100%
Multi-Core
9171
94%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
