Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — STGsivir outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of STGsivir Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 92 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Memory - €1003.4 vs €1009.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Memory - €10.91 vs €13.28 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
284th Variation
FPS
76
82.6086956521739%
Value, €/FPS
€13.28/FPS
82.15361445783132%
Price, €
€1009
99%
Buy for €1,009 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3713 minutes ago
6th Variation
FPS
92
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1003.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,003.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3709 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
284th Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
284th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
62.461899179366945%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
46.85427135678392%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-8700B
null-core
Single-Core
1533
60.568945080995654%
Multi-Core
5875
42.902000876296185%
Memory PC | vs | STGsivir Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700K | CPU | Core i7-8700B |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
