Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 13% better in World of Warcraft than Memory - 150 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Memory - €919.0 vs €949.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Memory - €6.13 vs €7.14 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
284th Variation
FPS
133
88.66666666666667%
Value, €/FPS
€7.14/FPS
85.85434173669468%
Price, €
€949
96%
Buy for €949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74884 minutes ago
18th Variation
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€919
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74895 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
284th Variation
18th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
284th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
62.461899179366945%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
46.85427135678392%
18th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
284th Variation
Core i7-12700K
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2531
100%
Multi-Core
13694
100%
CPU Winner
18th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
83.80086922165152%
Multi-Core
9729
71.04571345114648%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-12700K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |