Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 51% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Memory - 98 vs 65 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 1158 minutes ago
27th Variation
FPS
98
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.30/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1150 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
207th Variation
27th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
207th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660
6 GB GDDR5 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
34%
27th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
27th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2878
100%
Multi-Core
14943
99%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Ryzen 7 7700 |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
