Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 26% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Megaport - 92 vs 73 FPS
- Up to 13% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Megaport - €15.42 vs €17.79 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 8% cheaper than Memory - €1299.00 vs €1419.00
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,419 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
203rd Variation
58th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
203rd Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
58th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
47%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
58th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2536
100%
Multi-Core
13687
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 3600 | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
