Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Bandit P20 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ERAZER Bandit P20 - 140 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ERAZER Bandit P20 - €9.99 vs €10.97 per FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Bandit P20 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 4% cheaper than Memory - €1349.90 vs €1399.00
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6093 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
123
88%
Value, €/FPS
€10.97/FPS
91%
Price, €
€1349.9
100%
Buy for €1,349.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6084 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
198th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
198th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
47%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2775
100%
Multi-Core
17332
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | ERAZER Bandit P20 Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-10600KF | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |