Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 159 vs 147 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 18% cheaper than Memory - €1379.00 vs €1679.00
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - €9.38 vs €10.56 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,679 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3104 minutes ago
Buy for €1,379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3096 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
193rd Variation
32nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
193rd Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
67%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
75%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
193rd Variation
Core i7-12700K
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2531
100%
Multi-Core
13694
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
