Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 11% better in Minecraft than Memory - 711 vs 640 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 509 minutes ago
Buy for €1,889 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 504 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
192nd Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
192nd Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
62%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2608
100%
Multi-Core
15118
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700 | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
