Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Mini on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 657% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Mini - 106 vs 14 FPS
- Up to 59% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Mini - €18.58 vs €44.93 per FPS
Advantages of Mini PC
- Up to 68% cheaper than Memory - €629.00 vs €1969.00
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,969 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4896 minutes ago
Buy for €629 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4887 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
190th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
190th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
24%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
14%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
190th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Mini PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 9 6900HX |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | Radeon 680M |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
