Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 42% cheaper than Megaport - €909.00 vs €1559.00
- Up to 14% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - €9.47 vs €11.06 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 47% better in Monster Hunter: World than Memory - 141 vs 96 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €909 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 389 minutes ago
Buy for €1,559 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 387 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
250th Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
250th Variation
Radeon RX 6600 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
96%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
73%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
100%
Multi-Core
13890
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 3600 | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
