Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 71 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Memory - €799.00 vs €969.00
- Up to 19% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - €11.25 vs €13.84 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €969 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
249th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
249th Variation
Radeon RX 6600 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
100%
3rd Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
96%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
84%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600G
3.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1918
100%
Multi-Core
7665
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600G |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | GPU | Radeon RX 6600 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
