Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 150 vs 147 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Megaport - €1389.00 vs €1559.00
- Up to 13% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €9.26 vs €10.61 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,389 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6242 minutes ago
Buy for €1,559 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6238 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
169th Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
169th Variation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
166.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
416 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
73%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
83%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
169th Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
95%
Multi-Core
13890
94%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| Radeon RX 6750 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
