Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 52% cheaper than Captiva - €1119.0 vs €2309.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Dead Space than Captiva - €14.16 vs €19.08 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 53% better in Dead Space than Memory - 121 vs 79 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9401 minutes ago
Buy for €2,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
228th Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
228th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
55%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
