Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 110 vs 108 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 5% cheaper than Memory - €1199.00 vs €1259.00
- Up to 3% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - €11.10 vs €11.45 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,259 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 357 minutes ago
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
226th Variation
19th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
226th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
226th Variation
Core i9-11900F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2171
100%
Multi-Core
9171
94%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
