Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Cube - outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Memory - 118 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Memory - €1279.0 vs €1409.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Memory - €10.84 vs €12.58 per FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,409 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 491 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 485 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
215th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
215th Variation
Radeon RX 6600 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
71%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
215th Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
88%
Multi-Core
11527
77%
Memory PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
