Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 32% cheaper than Megaport - €959.00 vs €1419.00
- Up to 16% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €8.64 vs €10.28 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 24% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 138 vs 111 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €959 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 501 minutes ago
Buy for €1,419 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 495 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
210th Variation
30th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
210th Variation
Radeon RX 6600 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
96%
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
73%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
30th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
