Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 64% better in Monster Hunter: World than Memory - 133 vs 81 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 349 minutes ago
19th Variation
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 342 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
207th Variation
19th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
207th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660
6 GB GDDR5 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
70%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
46%
GPU Winner
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
207th Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
