Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 218% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 216 vs 68 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 530 minutes ago
26th Variation
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2669
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,669 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 523 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
206th Variation
26th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
206th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660
6 GB GDDR5 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
19%
26th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
26th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700 | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 480 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
