Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 38% cheaper than Megaport - €1369.0 vs €2199.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €9.92 vs €11.7 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 36% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 188 vs 138 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
203rd Variation
FPS
138
73.40425531914893%
Value, €/FPS
€9.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1369
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,369 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1625 minutes ago
35th Variation
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.7/FPS
84.7863247863248%
Price, €
€2199
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1620 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
203rd Variation
35th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
203rd Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
90.58823529411765%
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
96.58437605681435%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
203rd Variation
Ryzen 5 3600
null-core
Single-Core
1597
62.898779046868846%
Multi-Core
6884
49.56083513318934%
35th Variation
Core i9-12900F
null-core
Single-Core
2539
100%
Multi-Core
13890
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 3600 | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |