Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Vibox V-159 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 212% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox V-159 - 159 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 27% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Vibox V-159 - €10.31 vs €14.21 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox V-159 Gaming PC
- Up to 56% cheaper than Memory - €724.95 vs €1639.00
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,639 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Buy for €724.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
200th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
200th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
200th Variation
Core i7-12700K
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2531
100%
Multi-Core
13694
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Vibox V-159 Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-12700K | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |